Cross-Referencing 60,000 Competitor Parts Exposed Revenue Hiding in Their Own Catalog.
A Fortune 500 equipment manufacturer knew their parts could fit in competitor equipment. But discovering which ones across thousands of SKUs and hundreds of sources was impossible. We found 60,000 matches and millions in new revenue.
Fortune 500 Industrial Manufacturer

- Many of their parts are cross-compatible with competitor equipment already deployed in the field, and many competitor parts could serve as alternatives in their own equipment.
- What determines a match is whether the specs, materials, dimensions, and tolerances align.
- It pulled the data, extracted product attributes, normalized them into a comparable structure, and matched them against the company's own catalog on specs, materials, dimensions, and tolerances to identify true cross-compatibility.
- Products they already manufactured.
The Situation
This company manufactures equipment and parts. Many of their parts are cross-compatible with competitor equipment already deployed in the field, and many competitor parts could serve as alternatives in their own equipment. Every overlap is either a revenue opportunity or a competitive threat. But with thousands of SKUs on both sides, there was no way to systematically discover which parts were cross-compatible in either direction. The opportunity was massive. The visibility was zero.
Why It Was Hard
Two parts from different manufacturers can have completely different part numbers and still be cross-compatible. What determines a match is whether the specs, materials, dimensions, and tolerances align. That information lived in PDFs, web pages, scanned data sheets, and inconsistent catalog listings. Each source described the same attributes differently. The discovery problem was not a catalog lookup — it was an attribute extraction and comparison problem across hundreds of unstructured sources. Every potential match required pulling product data from a competitor source, extracting the relevant attributes, normalizing them into a comparable structure, and comparing them against the company's own catalog. The competitor landscape spanned hundreds of thousands of SKUs across hundreds of sources in inconsistent formats. That was an operation that could never be staffed. Every year it got discussed. Every year it got shelved.
What We Built
The solution worked across hundreds of competitor sources in every format. It pulled the data, extracted product attributes, normalized them into a comparable structure, and matched them against the company's own catalog on specs, materials, dimensions, and tolerances to identify true cross-compatibility. Clear matches moved forward. Uncertain matches went to an engineer for review, and each correction sharpened the next round. Everything ran inside the company's own infrastructure. No data left the building.
The Result
The commercial team received a validated, actionable database of 60,000 parts their company could sell as direct replacements into competitor equipment already in the field. Products they already manufactured. An aftermarket revenue stream they had been missing for years because no one could see the cross-compatibility map. The operation now runs continuously, discovering new matches as competitor catalogs and equipment models change.
We tried RPA. We tried big consultancies with data platforms. Nothing handled the variation. This was the first solution that actually worked across all of it.
— VP, Aftermarket
How much of your competitor's install base could your parts serve?
Let's walk through how this could work for you.
Book a Conversation

